RESNA Assistive Technology Professional (ATP): Decisions Across the Service Process Study Guide

Apply it

A referral requests a tablet for a student. The ATP first clarifies whether the difficulty concerns written assignments, communication, reading access, or several activities, then identifies the staff and family members needed for those decisions.

Apply it

A therapy report describes accurate pointing, while a teacher reports frequent selection errors. The ATP compares positioning, target size, task duration, and assistance in both settings before deciding what additional observation is necessary.

Apply it

A family emphasizes faster dressing, while the client prioritizes independently contacting friends. The ATP explores both activities, records the client's priorities, and agrees with the team on which outcomes the initial intervention will address.

Apply it

An employee can press a large button during testing but cannot complete a workstation sequence while tracking instructions. The ATP observes the combined task to determine whether access, sequencing support, or both require further assessment.

Apply it

A learner selects accurately for five minutes but reports difficulty during longer lessons. The ATP arranges observations across representative lesson periods and records accuracy, assistance, and the learner's experience as the activity continues.

Apply it

A client makes a large arm movement and a smaller, more consistent hand movement. The ATP compares intentional activations, accidental inputs, placement, and repeated task completion before identifying access features for a trial.

Apply it

A person reads a display indoors but struggles beside a bright window. The ATP compares task performance with different placement and contrast settings, documenting which conditions make the information consistently distinguishable during normal use.

Apply it

A worker responds to a device signal in a quiet office but misses it on the production floor. The ATP evaluates the actual notification task and compares accessible visual, auditory, and other available signaling features.

Apply it

A client notices a reminder to prepare lunch but stops after gathering supplies. Observation shows that initiating is successful while sequencing remains difficult, directing trials toward step support rather than simply adding more reminder alerts.

Apply it

A communicator gives inconsistent responses on small targets but responds consistently when the same choices are presented through a more accessible method. The team examines access and presentation before interpreting the earlier errors as misunderstanding.

Apply it

A client stopped using an electronic organizer after moving workplaces. The ATP discovers that the new setting restricts personal devices and assesses the current work routine before deciding whether to adapt the strategy or replace the organizer.

Apply it

A wheelchair user can enter a classroom but cannot reach the assigned workstation with the usual equipment arrangement. The ATP follows the complete arrival and work sequence to identify where environmental changes or different features are needed.

Apply it

A student trials equipment successfully at school, but the family cannot transport the proposed setup using their usual arrangements. The ATP includes the travel sequence and relevant transportation stakeholders before finalizing the functional requirements.

Apply it

A teacher requests dictation software because written work is incomplete. The ATP reviews assignments and observes the learner to distinguish text-entry difficulty from problems organizing ideas, accessing source material, or following the assignment sequence.

Apply it

An employee reports difficulty completing digital orders. With appropriate participation and information sharing, the ATP observes whether the barrier concerns navigation, data entry, reading the display, or switching between applications during the normal workflow.

Apply it

A client wants to join family game nights. The ATP clarifies whether the priority is independently selecting moves, handling materials, or communicating during play, then assesses the barriers within the family's usual game setting.

Apply it

A student will move from one classroom to several teaching locations next term. The ATP assesses carrying, setup, charging, and support needs across the planned locations rather than assuming the current single-room arrangement will transfer unchanged.

Apply it

A communicator needs independent selection, portable use, and vocabulary available during community activities. The team writes those requirements before comparing products, preventing an attractive display or familiar brand from dominating the decision without supporting the goals.

Apply it

Two commercial controls fail to fit a client's usable movement and workspace. The ATP documents the unmet placement requirement, explores a modification with qualified collaborators, and compares its support needs with other available approaches before recommending it.

Apply it

For a work-task trial, the team records correct orders completed during a defined task period and the assistance required. The same measures are collected with the current method and candidate options under comparable work conditions.

Apply it

A new access method is compared with a familiar method after only a brief demonstration. The ATP adds basic training and repeats representative tasks, recording assistance and exposure before interpreting differences in speed and accuracy.

Apply it

Two devices meet the task objective, but the client prefers the slightly slower option because it can be carried independently. The ATP documents that preference and compares everyday setup demands before supporting the final selection.

Apply it

A trial demonstrates reliable requesting during snack time. The team extends observation to classroom discussion and family conversation, examining whether the person can initiate topics and express different intentions with the proposed vocabulary and access method.

Apply it

A person frequently touches neighboring targets on the required layout. Adjusted direct selection reduces errors but still requires assistance. During switch scanning, the person follows the sequence and activates reliably without help at an acceptable rate. The team checks whether that advantage persists with daily messages, sustained use, and the intended visual or auditory presentation.

Apply it

A worker uses alternative input that sends keyboard commands. During a software trial, the ATP tests opening records, editing fields, using dialogs, and submitting work to establish whether the entire required workflow is operable through the keyboard interface.

Apply it

A worker needs step guidance at a station where personal electronic devices are prohibited. The ATP trials an approved task-located visual sequence and compares performance with other permitted supports rather than assuming a portable reminder application is usable.

Apply it

A client activates a room-control interface successfully during a demonstration. The ATP also trials the intended appliances, feedback, normal equipment placement, and setup responsibilities at home before recommending the complete environmental control arrangement for regular use.

Apply it

A client trials an adapted utensil successfully when it is placed in the hand. The ATP then examines obtaining, positioning, using, and cleaning it to determine whether the full meal routine meets the client's desired level of independence.

Apply it

A client with reduced sensation, a previous pressure injury, and limited trunk stability wants independent manual mobility. The team measures the body, assesses posture and pressure-management abilities, and compares compatible cushions and supports. During trials with the proposed cushion installed, they observe stable sitting and whether the client can reach the pushrims with adequate shoulder movement and propel on relevant surfaces.

Apply it

A client compares two high-contrast display arrangements during actual scheduling tasks in the usual workspace. The ATP records reading errors, completion, assistance, and feedback instead of selecting the option that appears clearest to the assessor.

Apply it

A student needs communication throughout the school day, but equipment servicing may interrupt access. The team includes an agreed communication continuity strategy, staff preparation, and service contacts in the selection plan rather than addressing downtime only after failure.

Apply it

One option costs 800 units plus 500 for required setup and training; another costs 1,100 including those services. Assuming equivalent functional fit and no other cost differences, the team compares totals of 1,300 and 1,100.

Apply it

A recommendation includes an access device but omits its mounting and training requirements. Before submission, the ATP adds the trial-supported feature rationale, necessary components, service costs, and implementation responsibilities so the proposed solution can be procured coherently.

Apply it

An ATP discloses a supplier relationship and evaluates its effect on the selection decision. If judgment can remain objective and applicable rules permit involvement, the ATP documents the comparison and safeguards. If a substantial financial stake is likely to impair judgment, the ATP recuses from that decision and arranges an independent qualified practitioner to support the client's selection.

Apply it

Equipment is approved months after the trial, and the client now works at another location. Before ordering and installation, the ATP confirms the new environment, current goals, support contacts, and whether the approved configuration still meets requirements.

Apply it

A supplier proposes a different control because the specified item is delayed. The ATP compares its activation and compatibility features with the trial-supported requirements and confirms the consequences with the client before accepting a substitution.

Apply it

A newly assembled system powers on, but one required control fails during preparation. The ATP documents and resolves the problem before delivery rather than using the client training appointment to discover whether the incomplete setup is workable.

Apply it

A manual wheelchair user with pressure-management and trunk-support needs receives the selected cushion and supports. The team checks body fit and seated posture with the cushion installed, then observes whether the client reaches the pushrims with adequate shoulder movement and propels along the agreed route. Any adjustment is rechecked for its effects on posture, pressure management, and mobility.

Apply it

An alternative input system worked during trials with particular access settings. After installation at the client's workstation, the ATP checks those settings and the complete work sequence, correcting differences before beginning independent-use verification with the client.

Apply it

A client has difficulty following a long verbal demonstration. The ATP provides accessible step supports and guided practice on the actual task, checks understanding through performance, and revises instruction based on the client's observed learning needs.

Apply it

A student operates a device during individual training but needs it in classrooms, transport transitions, and community activities. The team practices relevant setup and use routines in those settings, identifying support responsibilities and any remaining barriers.

Apply it

During classroom discussion, the team records whether staff place AAC within reach, model relevant messages, pause long enough for a response, acknowledge the learner's attempts, and return the conversational turn. If staff repeatedly answer before the learner can finish selecting, coaching targets response time and turn-taking, followed by another observation of classroom interaction.

Apply it

A client completes a sequence only after the trainer points to every control. The trainer documents that assistance, gradually reduces the teaching prompts, and checks whether the client can complete the activity using the agreed permanent supports.

Apply it

A client attends every session but still requires help submitting completed work. The ATP observes the full task, identifies the unresolved step, and arranges targeted instruction before documenting that the client's independent submission goal has been achieved.

Apply it

A client can operate a system but becomes dependent whenever it stops responding. The ATP teaches the agreed user-level checks, provides accessible support instructions, and practices identifying when the problem should be referred to the service provider.

Apply it

At wheelchair delivery, the team reviews care and scheduled maintenance information, identifies who will arrange service, and confirms how the client will report problems. The arrangements are documented alongside training and follow-up needs for continued use.

Apply it

A school changes support staff after installation. The implementation record describes the agreed settings, learner's verified tasks, remaining training needs, maintenance contact, and circumstances requiring review, allowing the new team to continue the established plan coherently.

Apply it

A client independently completes 18 of 24 comparable transactions after intervention, compared with 12 of 24 beforehand. The ATP reports improvement from 50% to 75%, a 25-percentage-point increase, while also documenting task conditions and remaining assistance.

Apply it

A client completes tasks faster but reports avoiding the device outside home because setup requires unwanted assistance. The ATP records the performance gain and explores the reported burden before deciding whether the intervention has achieved its participation goal.

Apply it

Baseline work was completed independently, but follow-up work included frequent staff cues. The ATP separates assisted and independent results and repeats a comparable observation before claiming that the intervention improved independent task completion for the client.

Apply it

A communicator operates the system accurately during review but uses it rarely at home. The team examines availability, routines, partner support, and current communication priorities before deciding whether access retraining or another intervention change is appropriate.

Apply it

A client previously used a control reliably but now reports increasing selection difficulty during ordinary tasks. The ATP reviews current access performance and relevant changes, involving appropriate collaborators before deciding whether adjustment, training, or a different strategy is needed.

Apply it

A worker's alternative input remains functional after an office move, but the new workstation arrangement prevents the previous setup. The ATP reassesses placement and workflow demands before concluding that the worker has lost the ability to use the system.

Apply it

A wheelchair user reports that a previously manageable route has become difficult. The team reviews the reported change, equipment condition, maintenance history, and current route demands, arranging appropriate service or reassessment rather than assuming the user needs more practice.

Apply it

A client completes a sequence accurately but needs assistance locating one control after a layout change. The ATP trials a targeted configuration adjustment and checks the full activity before considering a broader change to the technology solution.

Apply it

After a complex implementation, the team schedules review of the unresolved task goal, identifies the contact person, and explains that changes in access, environment, or equipment performance should prompt earlier contact rather than waiting for the planned appointment.

Apply it

A young adult's system supported classroom assignments, but the current priority is managing communication and tasks at work. Follow-up revisits goals, settings, and support responsibilities instead of evaluating success solely through the former school-based measures.

Apply it

A follow-up report records improved task accuracy but continued setup dependence. It explains the conditions, includes the client's priorities, and names the person responsible for trialing a setup modification and reporting results at the agreed review.

Apply it

A vendor requests a client's full history before a demonstration, and the ATP has a substantial financial stake in the vendor's selection. The ATP limits information sharing to what is relevant and appropriately authorized. If the stake is likely to impair judgment, the ATP recuses from the selection decision and coordinates an independent qualified practitioner rather than relying on disclosure alone.

Apply it

An ATP encounters a specialized modification outside current expertise. The ATP involves a qualified collaborator, communicates responsibilities to the client, and identifies targeted learning needs, later sharing appropriate general lessons through professional education without disclosing confidential client information.