Nursing · Independent exam preparation
NMC Test of Competence 2021: Computer-Based Test (CBT) Study Guide
Practise calculations, clinical observation interpretation, medicine safety, consent and care coordination for the NMC adult nursing CBT through focused cases and recall drills.
By CertMedbry · Updated 28 October 2026
Learn to calculate doses with consistent units, connect physiological changes with clinical observations, recognise urgent deterioration, monitor medicines and support informed choices. This guide selects the adult nursing pathway, booking code RNA, for UK registered-nurse registration or readmission. Its 60 concepts cover numeracy, all seven nursing platforms and both annexes, with adult clinical examples. The official nursing specification and adult nursing blueprint define the full examination scope; this selective guide should be studied alongside them.
Try 20 free practice questionsWhat is the exam format?
Check the question types, timing and outline before planning your revision.
Which examination pathway does this guide cover?
This guide covers the adult nursing CBT, booking code RNA. The NMC also lists RNMH for mental health nursing, RNLD for learning disabilities nursing, RNC for children's nursing and RM for midwifery. Candidates must select the examination matching their registration application. Shared nursing platforms do not remove the need to study the appropriate field-specific blueprint.
NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021 · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
How many questions are there, and how long does each part take?
Part A contains 15 numeracy questions with 30 minutes allowed. Part B contains 100 clinical questions with 150 minutes allowed. The standard total is 115 questions over three hours. Optional unscheduled breaks use examination time. Approved reasonable adjustments may change an individual's arrangements.
NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021 · Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test
Which questions are scored, and is there a separate pretest allowance?
The nursing handbook describes 15 numeracy marks and 100 theory marks, with questions scored correct or incorrect and no partial credit. It does not identify a separate unscored pretest allocation. No additional pretest count should therefore be assumed.
Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test
What answer formats and delivery arrangements should candidates expect?
The CBT is delivered under standardised conditions at Pearson test centres. Part A requires numerical answers entered on screen; Part B uses multiple-choice questions. The handbook permits reviewing and changing answers and provides an on-screen calculator. The official materials describe fixed question counts but do not establish an adaptive testing algorithm. The four-option calculations here are learning adaptations of numerical-answer tasks.
Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test · NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021
Which specification and blueprint versions apply?
As of 28 October 2026, the official preparation page continues to identify Test of Competence 2021, introduced on 2 August 2021. The nursing specification is V1.1 and states an August 2021 effective period. The adult nursing blueprint is V1.0. The nursing CBT handbook is V.3, updated April 2025. The September 2026 announcements concern OSCE stations, not a replacement CBT specification.
Test of Competence 2021: Preparation materials · Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0 · Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test
How is the nursing clinical blueprint weighted?
Within the 100-question Part B, the allocations are: accountable professional 17%; health promotion and prevention 10%; assessment and planning 14%; providing and evaluating care 15%; leadership and teamwork 10%; safety and quality 10%; coordination 10%; communication Annexe A 7%; and procedures Annexe B 7%. Part A is separately assessed. Its 15 questions cover correct dose measurement 2, metric units 2, oral medicines 4, injections 3, intravenous infusions 3 and fluid balance 1.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
How are results and passing requirements described?
Part A and Part B receive separate pass or fail results, and both must be passed. A failed part can be retaken without repeating a passed part, subject to the NMC's current attempt rules. The handbook describes standard setting and statistical maintenance across test versions but does not provide a numerical passing threshold. Use the current NMC instructions for results and resits.
NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021 · Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test
How does the CBT relate to the OSCE and to midwifery?
The CBT is part one of the Test of Competence; the OSCE is the practical second part. They may be taken in either order, and both are required where the NMC requires the Test of Competence. The adult blueprint distinguishes possible CBT and OSCE assessment. Midwifery has its own specification and six-domain blueprint based on midwife standards; its clinical allocations must not be substituted for nursing weights.
NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021 · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0 · Test of Competence 2021: Midwifery Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Test of Competence 2021: Midwifery blueprint, V1.0
How should these drills be used?
Use the 20 questions to practise single-best-answer reasoning and the flashcards to test recall. Their distribution approximates the nursing blueprint while retaining coverage of every domain. They are independent learning questions, not an adaptive examination, an OSCE simulation or a validated prediction of examination performance. Use the official blueprint to identify additional adult nursing topics requiring study.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
The NMC sets the Test of Competence; Pearson Professional Assessments delivers its CBT component. This is preparation for registered adult nursing practice, not advanced nurse practitioner certification. The guide, questions and flashcards are independent educational materials and are not endorsed by the NMC.
Outline used: Test of Competence 2021, introduced 2 August 2021 and still linked from the current NMC preparation page on 2026-10-11. Nursing Test Specification for Candidates V1.1; Adult nursing blueprint V1.0; Nursing CBT candidate information booklet marked V.3, updated April 2025. The workbook label names the regulator and its CBT component rather than one field-specific examination. The assigned slug is preserved. This category 2. Nursing preview covers common nursing platforms and annexes, using adult clinical examples; it does not claim coverage of the separate midwifery clinical outline or every nursing field's specialist content.
60 key concepts: understand, apply and avoid the traps
Work through the questions by exam domain. Explain the answer in your own words, try the example, then check the common pitfall.
Part A: Numeracy15 of 115 questions; separately assessed
1.How do consistent metric units prevent calculation errors?
A dose and its available strength must use compatible units before division. One gram equals 1,000 milligrams, and one milligram equals 1,000 micrograms. Converting the prescribed quantity first prevents a thousandfold error from being hidden inside otherwise correct arithmetic. Keep units beside each working step and estimate the expected scale of the result. A correct numerical operation cannot compensate for comparing milligrams directly with micrograms.
Apply it
A hypothetical prescription requires 0.25 g, and each suitable tablet contains 125 mg. Convert 0.25 g to 250 mg, then divide 250 mg by 125 mg per tablet to obtain two tablets.
Common pitfall: Moving a decimal without naming the starting and finishing units invites reversal. Check whether conversion to a smaller unit should produce a larger numerical value.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
2.Which measuring device can deliver the calculated dose accurately?
A calculated volume must be measurable with the available device. Read the scale, identify the value of each graduation and select a suitable calibrated device for the intended route. A small volume measured on a coarse scale can introduce substantial proportional error even when the calculation is correct. If the required quantity cannot be measured reliably, resolve the preparation or equipment issue before administration rather than inventing a convenient rounded dose.
Apply it
An oral medicine calculation gives 0.6 mL. A medicine cup has 5 mL markings, while an appropriate oral syringe has 0.1 mL graduations. Select the oral syringe and verify the prescribed volume against its scale.
Common pitfall: Choosing the largest available container because it holds the dose overlooks precision. Rounding must follow the specified instructions and must not conceal unsuitable measuring equipment.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Read The Code online
3.How is a tablet quantity calculated safely?
Divide the prescribed dose by the amount in one tablet after making the units consistent. The resulting unit is tablets, not milligrams. Then check whether that quantity can be administered using the actual formulation. Arithmetic showing half a tablet does not establish that the product may be divided. Strength, formulation and any restrictions on splitting remain relevant checks before a calculated quantity becomes an administration decision.
Apply it
For a hypothetical exercise, a prescribed dose is 450 mg and each suitable tablet contains 150 mg. Dividing 450 by 150 gives three tablets. Verify the tablet strength before treating that result as the quantity to prepare.
Common pitfall: Using the number of tablets in a packet as the denominator confuses stock quantity with strength. The denominator must describe the amount in one tablet.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Read The Code online
4.How do you calculate an oral liquid volume?
Use prescribed dose divided by available dose, multiplied by the volume containing that available dose. A label stating 120 mg in 5 mL describes a ratio, so the 5 mL must remain part of the calculation. Alternatively, calculate milligrams per millilitre and divide the required milligrams by that concentration. Both methods should give the same volume. Check the actual concentration because different products may contain different amounts in the same volume.
Apply it
A fictional oral preparation contains 120 mg in 5 mL, and the prescribed dose is 180 mg. Calculate 180 divided by 120, multiplied by 5, giving 7.5 mL for the specified preparation.
Common pitfall: Dividing by 120 and stopping produces a dose ratio rather than millilitres. Include the stated stock volume and check that the final unit is mL.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
5.How does injection concentration determine the required volume?
For a prepared injection with a verified concentration, volume equals required dose divided by dose per millilitre. Distinguish the total amount in the container from its concentration: 100 mg in 2 mL means 50 mg per mL. Reconstituted products require the verified final concentration, not an assumption that added diluent always equals final volume. A mathematically correct volume still requires prescription, route, preparation and administration checks within competence.
Apply it
A hypothetical prepared solution contains 100 mg in 2 mL. The prescribed dose is 75 mg. The concentration is 50 mg/mL, so 75 divided by 50 gives a required volume of 1.5 mL.
Common pitfall: Treating 100 mg in 2 mL as 100 mg/mL halves the calculated volume. Read the complete concentration statement before selecting a formula or syringe.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Read The Code online · Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596
6.How is an intravenous pump rate calculated?
For a prescribed volume over a specified duration, divide millilitres by hours to obtain mL/hour. Convert minutes to hours before calculating when necessary, or calculate through minutes and convert the final rate consistently. Separate the prescribed total volume from the rate entered into the device. Checking that rate multiplied by duration reproduces the prescribed volume provides a useful independent arithmetic check before following the required administration process.
Apply it
An authorised hypothetical infusion contains 750 mL to run over six hours. Divide 750 by six to obtain 125 mL/hour. Multiplying 125 mL/hour by six hours returns 750 mL and checks the calculation.
Common pitfall: Entering the total volume as the hourly rate would deliver it over the wrong duration. Confirm both the requested unit and the device parameter being set.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
7.How does a giving set's drop factor affect a gravity rate?
A gravity rate in drops per minute equals volume in millilitres multiplied by the giving set's drops per millilitre, divided by time in minutes. The drop factor is equipment-specific and must be supplied or verified. Converting hours to minutes prevents a sixtyfold error. Follow any stated rounding instruction because individual drops are counted as whole drops; a different giving set can require a different drop rate for the same prescribed infusion.
Apply it
For an arithmetic exercise, 500 mL is prescribed over four hours using a set calibrated at 20 drops/mL. Calculate 500 multiplied by 20, divided by 240 minutes: 41.67, or 42 drops/minute when instructed to round.
Common pitfall: Assuming every giving set has the same drop factor makes a familiar calculation unsafe. Use the specified set calibration rather than a remembered default value.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
8.What does a recorded fluid balance actually show?
Recorded fluid balance equals documented intake minus documented output over the same period. A positive result means recorded intake exceeds recorded output; a negative result means the reverse. Include each listed route once and use consistent units. The arithmetic describes the chart, not a complete diagnosis of hydration: omitted intake, unmeasured losses, timing errors and the person's clinical condition can change its interpretation. State the sign and the period with the result.
Apply it
Over a defined shift, documented intake is 900 mL orally and 500 mL intravenously. Recorded output is 1,100 mL urine and 150 mL drainage. The recorded balance is 1,400 minus 1,250, or positive 150 mL.
Common pitfall: A positive chart balance does not independently prove fluid overload. Check chart completeness and assess the person before drawing conclusions or changing the care plan.
Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1 · Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
Being an accountable professional17% of nursing Part B
9.What makes consent informed and meaningful?
Consent requires a voluntary decision supported by information the person can understand about the proposed care. Explain its purpose, relevant benefits, risks and alternatives, and check understanding before proceeding. A signature can document a decision but cannot replace the discussion. The decisive issue is whether the person can make the particular decision with appropriate support and is choosing freely. Consent must remain relevant to the actual intervention being offered.
Apply it
An adult agrees to a dressing change but believes it will permanently cure the underlying condition. Explain the actual purpose and limitations, invite questions and check understanding before asking whether they wish to proceed.
Common pitfall: A completed form is tempting evidence of consent, but misunderstanding or pressure can undermine the decision. Address those problems rather than relying on paperwork alone.
Read The Code online · Shared decision making — NICE NG197 recommendations
10.How should an informed refusal influence care?
An adult's informed refusal must be taken seriously when they can make the relevant decision. Explore the reason, correct misunderstandings and explain likely consequences and alternatives without coercion. A refusal of one intervention does not mean refusal of all care. Continue appropriate assessment, offer acceptable options and document the discussion and decision. In England and Wales, an unwise decision alone does not establish incapacity; assess the decision-specific statutory criteria if there is a reason to doubt capacity.
Apply it
A person declines washing because their usual carer is present. Speak privately, establish their preferences and offer another time or suitable staff member. Record the decision and maintain other agreed care without labelling them uncooperative.
Common pitfall: Disagreement with professional advice does not by itself demonstrate inability to decide. Avoid substituting your preferred outcome for assessment of the person's actual understanding and choice.
Read The Code online · Make decisions on behalf of someone: Checking mental capacity - GOV.UK · Mental Capacity Act 2005
11.How is capacity assessed for a particular decision in England and Wales?
Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England and Wales, presume capacity and provide practicable support. At the relevant time, incapacity requires inability to understand, retain, use or weigh information relevant to the decision, or communicate the decision by any means, because of an impairment or disturbance of mind or brain. Assess the causal link and the particular decision. Brief retention can suffice if it enables the decision. Diagnosis, age, communication difficulty or an unwise choice alone does not establish incapacity.
Apply it
An adult with hearing loss initially cannot follow a treatment discussion. Restore their hearing aid and explain the options simply. They then describe the benefits, risks and consequences, weigh them against their priorities and refuse treatment. The refusal alone does not establish incapacity. By contrast, delirium that prevents weighing those consequences despite support may establish incapacity for that decision at that time.
Common pitfall: Do not use orientation questions or agreement with advice as substitutes for the statutory criteria. A person may have capacity for one decision but lack it for another; reassess when temporary impairment changes.
Make decisions on behalf of someone: Checking mental capacity - GOV.UK · Mental Capacity Act 2005 · http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2005/9 · Read The Code online
12.Which disclosures respect confidentiality?
Confidentiality requires checking who needs information, why they need it and whether disclosure has an appropriate basis. A relative's relationship does not automatically authorise access to clinical details. Confirm the person's wishes where possible and share only information relevant to the legitimate purpose. Safety or legal duties may justify disclosure without consent, but the reason and scope must be considered and recorded. Privacy also applies to conversations and electronic communication.
Apply it
A caller identifies themselves as a patient's sibling and requests results. The patient has not authorised disclosure. Verify identity as appropriate, explain the confidentiality limit and ask the patient whom they want involved in receiving information.
Common pitfall: Knowing a patient's name and date of birth does not establish permission to receive their information. Identity verification and authority to disclose are separate questions.
13.How do accurate records support safe decisions?
Useful records distinguish observations, the person's account, clinical judgement and actions taken. Enter information at the time or as soon as possible, identify delayed entries and document relevant risks, escalation and responses. Accuracy includes recording what was actually done rather than what was intended. Clear timing and attribution help later clinicians interpret change and follow outstanding actions. Corrections must preserve an honest account rather than conceal the original entry.
Apply it
After urgent assistance delays documentation, record the event with its actual occurrence time and identify the later entry time. Include observed changes, whom you contacted, advice received, actions completed and the person's subsequent condition.
Common pitfall: Backdating an entry to make it appear contemporaneous creates a misleading chronology. A transparent delayed entry is safer than an apparently perfect but inaccurate record.
14.What does professional candour require after harm?
Professional candour means being open and honest when care goes wrong and causes, or could cause, harm or distress. Attend to the person's immediate needs, explain what is known, apologise and describe the next steps. Distinguish established facts from matters still being investigated. Support the person's questions and keep them informed as understanding develops. Internal reporting and investigation support learning but do not replace the conversation with the affected person.
Apply it
A missed prescribed treatment has caused avoidable discomfort. Arrange appropriate review, explain the omission and known consequences, apologise and describe how it will be investigated. Record the discussion and ensure the person receives further information as it becomes available.
Common pitfall: Waiting for a completed investigation before acknowledging known facts delays openness. Conversely, offering an unverified explanation as certainty can mislead the person and undermine trust.
Openness and honesty when things go wrong: The professional duty of candour
15.When should a nurse stop and seek competent assistance?
Accountability includes recognising the limits of current knowledge and skill. Before undertaking an unfamiliar activity, identify what competence, supervision and authorisation it requires. Seek a suitably competent practitioner when those conditions are absent, while continuing care you can safely provide. Previous exposure or a colleague's reassurance does not establish competence. Urgency increases the need for prompt help and clear communication; it does not justify pretending to possess skills you lack.
Apply it
You are asked to use an unfamiliar infusion device without training. Explain the limitation promptly, obtain a competent colleague and ensure the prescribed treatment is not simply abandoned while appropriate assistance is being arranged.
Common pitfall: Reading a brief instruction sheet may support trained practice but does not automatically establish competence. Avoid accepting a task solely because the ward is busy.
16.How do professional boundaries protect therapeutic relationships?
Professional relationships exist to meet the person's care needs, not the practitioner's personal or financial interests. Maintain clear boundaries, avoid exploiting trust and consider whether personal involvement could affect judgement or create obligations. Social media contact can blur confidentiality and relationship boundaries even outside working hours. When a request feels personal, acknowledge the person's intention respectfully and use appropriate professional channels to maintain support without creating a private dependent relationship.
Apply it
A patient requests ongoing private messaging through your personal social media account after discharge. Thank them, explain the professional boundary and provide the appropriate service contact for questions about their continuing care and support.
Common pitfall: A well-intentioned personal connection can still create unequal expectations and privacy risks. The patient's invitation does not remove the nurse's responsibility to maintain appropriate boundaries.
17.How should a safeguarding concern be handled?
A safeguarding concern requires attention to immediate safety, the person's account and appropriate reporting. Listen without promising absolute secrecy, record relevant facts accurately and follow applicable safeguarding procedures. Distinguish what you observed from what someone reported. Involve the person as appropriate while recognising that risk or legal duties may require information sharing. You do not need to prove abuse before raising a concern, and you should not conduct an unauthorised investigation.
Apply it
An adult says a carer has threatened them and asks you to tell nobody. Explain the limits of confidentiality, assess immediate safety, document their words accurately and contact the appropriate safeguarding lead through the service's procedure.
Common pitfall: Promising secrecy may prevent necessary protection. Avoid confrontational fact-finding that could increase risk or compromise a properly coordinated safeguarding assessment and response.
Read The Code online · Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates
Promoting health and preventing ill health10% of nursing Part B
18.How can smoking advice support a person's readiness to change?
Effective smoking advice connects the person's priorities with practical support. Ask about smoking, previous attempts and interest in stopping without blame. Explain that support and suitable stop-smoking treatments can help, then offer a route to personalised advice. Readiness guides the next step: someone considering change may need exploration, while someone ready to quit needs a workable plan. A respectful conversation keeps support available even when the person is not ready today.
Apply it
A smoker says breathlessness makes playing with grandchildren difficult but doubts they can stop. Explore that goal, acknowledge previous efforts and offer contact with a stop-smoking service to discuss support matched to their needs.
Common pitfall: Repeating health risks without asking about priorities may produce little useful planning. Do not interpret hesitation as permission to pressure, shame or withdraw future support.
19.What makes a smoking quit plan practical?
A practical quit plan identifies a planned start, likely triggers and sources of support rather than relying on determination alone. Explore routines linked to smoking, agree alternatives and connect the person with appropriate treatment advice. Previous attempts provide information about difficult situations and helpful strategies. Review progress and adapt the plan after a lapse. The decision cue is whether the plan addresses the person's actual circumstances and gives them a next action.
Apply it
A person ready to stop usually smokes during work breaks. Help them plan a different break routine, identify someone supportive and arrange stop-smoking advice. Agree when they will review what worked and what remained difficult.
Common pitfall: Treating one lapse as total failure can discourage another attempt. Use it to identify a trigger and revise support rather than abandoning the person's wider goal.
20.Which activity targets apply to adults aged 19 to 64?
NHS guidance for adults aged 19 to 64 recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity weekly, or 75 minutes of vigorous activity, or an equivalent combination. Strengthening activities should involve major muscle groups on at least two days weekly. Moderate activity increases breathing while still allowing conversation. Encourage gradual progress and less sedentary time. These population recommendations require adaptation to individual ability and clinical circumstances rather than automatic prescription during acute illness.
Apply it
A well 40-year-old walks briskly for 30 minutes on five days each week but does no strengthening activity. Recognise that the moderate aerobic target is met and discuss adding suitable strengthening activities on two days.
Common pitfall: Meeting an aerobic target does not replace strengthening activity. Conversely, the guideline is not a reason to discourage useful smaller amounts while an inactive person builds confidence.
21.Why must health information fit the person's access needs?
Information can influence health only if the person can access, understand and use it. Ask about language, literacy, sensory needs and preferred formats rather than assuming that a standard leaflet is sufficient. Adapt the format and connect advice with an achievable action. The discriminating cue is a barrier between receiving information and acting on it. Equitable support may therefore require different resources for different people rather than identical materials for everyone.
Apply it
A person with reduced vision receives a small-print smoking leaflet they cannot read. Ask about their preferred format, provide an accessible alternative and discuss one practical route to support that they can use independently.
Common pitfall: Documenting that a leaflet was supplied does not establish meaningful education. Check usability and the person's intended next action rather than counting materials distributed as success.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Read The Code online
22.How are prevention goals made achievable?
A prevention goal works best when it connects a valued outcome with a specific behaviour and a realistic review point. Explore practical barriers, available support and confidence before agreeing the first step. The person should help choose the action, because a professionally desirable target may be unworkable in their circumstances. Review what happened and adapt the plan. Progress is judged against the agreed behaviour and outcome, not simply whether advice was delivered.
Apply it
An inactive adult wants more energy but cannot afford a gym. Agree a short walking routine that fits their day, identify a safe route and arrange a review of participation and confidence before increasing the target.
Common pitfall: A broad instruction to exercise more leaves action and evaluation undefined. Avoid assuming that cost, transport, caring responsibilities or symptoms are excuses rather than planning constraints.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64 — NHS
Assessing needs and planning care14% of nursing Part B
23.What makes a nursing assessment holistic?
A holistic assessment combines physical findings with psychological, cognitive, social and functional information relevant to care. Establish the person's usual abilities and priorities so that new problems can be recognised against a baseline. Include communication needs and available support rather than allowing a diagnosis to define the whole plan. The decision is which findings change current risks, assistance or goals. Gather information proportionately and confirm assumptions with the person wherever possible.
Apply it
An adult admitted with reduced mobility normally lives alone and manages medicines independently. Assess current transfers, cognition, confidence and home support as well as physical symptoms, because these findings affect both immediate assistance and later discharge planning.
Common pitfall: A diagnosis-focused assessment can miss functional losses or support needs. Conversely, collecting extensive information without linking it to decisions does not make the assessment more useful.
24.Which cognitive changes should prompt delirium assessment?
Consider delirium when attention, cognition, perception, physical function or behaviour changes over hours or days, especially with fluctuation. Compare with the person's usual state, including when dementia is already present. NICE recommends the 4AT when delirium indicators are identified in general hospital or long-term care settings. In critical care or postoperative recovery, use CAM-ICU or ICDSC instead. A positive assessment requires appropriate diagnostic assessment and identification of underlying causes, which may be multiple.
Apply it
A previously conversational inpatient becomes intermittently inattentive and withdrawn after developing fever and poor intake. Establish the baseline, arrange 4AT assessment and assess oxygenation, hydration, infection, pain and recent medicine changes. The acute fluctuation supports possible delirium rather than assuming dementia progression.
Common pitfall: Neither agitation nor a new dementia diagnosis is required. Do not apply the general-setting tool automatically in critical care or postoperative recovery, or let screening delay urgent assessment of physiological deterioration.
Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management — NICE CG103 recommendations
25.How does assessment of delirium contributors lead to nursing action?
Hypoactive delirium can appear as withdrawal, reduced movement, slow responses and poor engagement. Assess contributors and act on the findings: hypoxia requires prompt respiratory assessment and appropriate oxygen treatment; dehydration requires a suitable fluid plan; infection needs clinical assessment and treatment; pain requires assessment and relief; and potentially contributing medicines need review. Combine cause-directed care with calm reorientation, a visible clock and calendar, functioning hearing aids or glasses, familiar support and protection of sleep.
Apply it
An older adult becomes quiet and confused, has low oxygen saturation, has drunk little and reports pain. Begin urgent ABCDE assessment, address hypoxia, assess fluid needs with attention to heart or kidney disease, and arrange pain and medicine review. Explain where they are, restore their hearing aid and reassess attention and observations after interventions.
Common pitfall: Calling someone settled because they are quiet can miss delirium or deterioration. Reorientation alone cannot correct hypoxia, dehydration or infection; persistent distress also warrants assessment before considering medication.
Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management — NICE CG103 recommendations · The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK
26.How is a person-centred outcome written?
A useful outcome describes a change that matters to the person, with enough detail and timing to evaluate it. Distinguish the desired result from the nursing intervention intended to achieve it. For example, improved participation in a chosen activity is an outcome; providing assistance is an action. Agree realistic criteria using assessment findings and the person's preferences. At review, compare actual performance or experience with those criteria rather than assuming completion of care means success.
Apply it
A patient wants to regain confidence washing at the sink. Assess baseline ability, agree the level of assistance and a review time, then document an observable participation goal alongside the support needed to work towards it.
Common pitfall: Writing 'assist with hygiene' describes staff activity but not the person's intended outcome. Avoid selecting an unsupported target before assessing current ability and discussing priorities.
27.How do fluid loss and perfusion findings change care priorities?
Loss of circulating volume reduces venous return and can reduce cardiac output. Tachycardia, cool peripheries, prolonged capillary refill, falling blood pressure and reduced urine output can indicate inadequate perfusion, but no single finding proves the cause. Assess these together with fluid losses, intake, bleeding and relevant comorbidities. Blood pressure can remain maintained during early compensation, so a normal reading does not cancel other concerning findings. Prioritise ABCDE assessment and timely treatment over completing routine tasks.
Apply it
After repeated vomiting, an adult develops a rising pulse, cool hands and reduced urine output despite a blood pressure close to their earlier value. Seek urgent review, assess circulation and ongoing losses, check the fluid chart and prepare to deliver prescribed fluid treatment. Reassess pulse, perfusion, blood pressure, urine output and breathing after treatment.
Common pitfall: Do not diagnose dehydration from a negative balance alone or assume every low urine output needs more fluid. Persistent poor perfusion and signs of fluid overload require reassessment of the cause and treatment.
The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
28.Why does changing renal function require a medicine-specific assessment?
Reduced renal clearance can increase exposure to medicines eliminated by the kidneys. For injectable amoxicillin, the product information requires dose adjustment according to renal impairment and warns that convulsions may occur with impaired renal function or high doses. Assess current renal results, prescribed regimen, urine output and new neurological symptoms together. Reduced urine output also warrants assessment of perfusion and catheter patency where applicable. A previous dose being tolerated does not establish that it remains appropriate after renal deterioration.
Apply it
An adult receiving intravenous amoxicillin develops worsening renal results and reduced urine output. Request prompt prescriber or pharmacist review of the regimen before the next dose is due, communicate the trend and monitor neurological status and fluid balance. A seizure requires an immediate emergency response rather than waiting for routine dose review.
Common pitfall: Do not independently select a replacement dose from an old renal result. Renal dosing, hydration and the clinical cause of reduced output require coordinated assessment and a documented current plan.
Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596 · The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
29.When should assessment and the care plan be revised?
Assessment is repeated when the person's condition changes, an intervention fails, new information emerges or the agreed review point is reached. Compare current findings with baseline and previous observations to identify direction and speed of change. A previously appropriate plan may become unsafe if needs or abilities alter. Revision should identify the new problem, change relevant actions and communicate the update so that the team does not continue using outdated assumptions.
Apply it
A patient who previously walked independently now needs two people to stand safely. Reassess the change, seek appropriate clinical review and update mobility assistance and handover information before the next transfer is attempted.
Common pitfall: A completed admission assessment is a baseline, not a permanent description. Copying yesterday's plan without checking current ability can perpetuate unsafe assistance levels and missed deterioration.
Providing and evaluating care15% of nursing Part B
30.How does ABCDE turn observations into immediate action?
Call for help early and treat threats as they are found. Airway: assess speech, airflow and obstruction sounds. Breathing: assess respiratory rate, effort, chest movement, breath sounds and oxygen saturation. Titrate oxygen to a usual saturation target of 94–98%, or 88–92% for patients at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure, recognising individual prescribed targets. Circulation: assess pulse, blood pressure, capillary refill, skin perfusion, bleeding and urine output. Disability: assess consciousness, pupils and blood glucose. Exposure: inspect for relevant injuries, rashes, wounds and temperature changes while preserving warmth and dignity. Repeat assessment after interventions; a complete history must not delay treatment.
Apply it
A responsive adult with no identified risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure and no different prescribed oxygen target speaks clearly, indicating a currently patent airway, but has a respiratory rate of 30 and oxygen saturation of 88%. Summon urgent help and administer oxygen under emergency guidance, titrating delivery to achieve 94–98%. Reassess saturation, respiratory rate, effort and consciousness promptly after starting oxygen and after each adjustment. Assess a rapid pulse, low blood pressure and cool skin for poor perfusion; check glucose, then inspect for bleeding, rash or infection. Recheck breathing and circulation immediately after treatment.
Common pitfall: Do not collect every observation before treating an identified threat. If the person becomes unresponsive and is not breathing normally, switch immediately to the cardiac arrest response.
The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK · Adult basic life support Guidelines — Resuscitation Council UK, 2025
31.Which findings require the cardiac arrest response?
An unresponsive adult who is not breathing normally should be treated as being in cardiac arrest. Abnormal gasping is not reassuring normal breathing. Activate emergency assistance, begin CPR and use an automated external defibrillator as soon as available, following its instructions. Avoid delaying resuscitation for a complete routine assessment. The decisive combination is unresponsiveness and absent or abnormal breathing, which differs from a responsive person who is breathing rapidly during deterioration.
Apply it
An adult collapses, does not respond and makes occasional irregular gasps. Call for emergency help and an AED, begin CPR promptly and follow the defibrillator instructions when it arrives, rather than waiting for routine observations.
Common pitfall: Mistaking gasps for effective breathing can delay CPR. The presence of occasional respiratory movement does not exclude cardiac arrest when the person is unresponsive and breathing abnormally.
Adult basic life support Guidelines — Resuscitation Council UK, 2025
32.How is pressure ulcer risk translated into prevention?
Pressure ulcer prevention begins with individual risk assessment, including mobility, ability to reposition, skin condition and relevant clinical factors. Use the findings to select assistance, repositioning and pressure redistribution rather than treating a risk score as the intervention. Reassess when the person's condition or mobility changes. The key decision is which tissue-loading risks remain unaddressed and what support is required. Document the preventive plan so that it can be delivered and evaluated consistently.
Apply it
A patient becomes less mobile after an acute illness and cannot turn independently. Reassess pressure risk, inspect relevant skin areas and arrange an individual prevention plan with repositioning assistance and suitable pressure-redistributing support.
Common pitfall: A completed risk tool does not itself reduce pressure. Avoid treating a low earlier score as reassurance after the person's mobility or clinical condition has changed.
Pressure ulcers: prevention and management — NICE CG179 recommendations
33.Which repositioning intervals and skin findings guide pressure prevention?
NICE recommends frequent repositioning at least every six hours for adults at risk and at least every four hours for adults at high risk, with individual requirements documented. Assess pressure areas for non-blanching discolouration, pain and changes in heat, firmness or moisture. Redness may be less apparent in darker skin tones, making comparison with surrounding skin and assessment of temperature and firmness particularly important. Non-blanching change requires preventive action and consideration of reassessment at least every two hours until resolved.
Apply it
A high-risk adult cannot turn independently. Document assistance at least every four hours and any need for more frequent relief. A newly discoloured, warmer, firmer heel prompts immediate pressure relief, review of heel offloading and the support surface, and closer skin reassessment. A specialist mattress does not replace repositioning.
Common pitfall: The six- and four-hour recommendations are not reasons to delay action when skin changes or discomfort appear. Do not rely on redness alone in darker skin or massage a vulnerable pressure area.
Pressure ulcers: prevention and management — NICE CG179 recommendations
34.How should observations and antibiotic response be evaluated in an adult with pneumonia?
Respiratory assessment must consider oxygenation and the work of breathing together: a rising respiratory rate or increasing effort remains concerning even if oxygen treatment maintains saturation. Assess circulation and mental state for wider deterioration. When amoxicillin is prescribed for a susceptible bacterial infection, it inhibits bacterial cell-wall synthesis, leading to cell damage and death; it does not immediately reverse respiratory compromise. Evaluate treatment through clinical trends and adverse effects, while ensuring prescribed doses are administered at the intended times.
Apply it
An adult treated for pneumonia has saturation within their prescribed target on oxygen, but their respiratory rate rises from 20 to 30 and they become confused. Begin urgent ABCDE reassessment and seek review; do not record improvement solely from saturation or assume the antibiotic dose has already corrected the respiratory problem.
Common pitfall: A diagnosis or administered antibiotic does not explain away worsening observations. Apparent failure can require reassessment of the organism, treatment suitability, complications or another cause, rather than an unauthorised dose increase.
The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK · Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596 · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
35.How should pain relief be evaluated?
Pain evaluation compares the person's report and relevant functional effects before and after an intervention. Use an appropriate assessment approach and ask whether relief allows the activity or comfort goal that matters to them. Document the intervention, response and any adverse effects, then revise or escalate care if relief is inadequate. Administration alone does not prove effectiveness. Timing of reassessment should suit the intervention and clinical situation rather than an arbitrary assumption that improvement has occurred.
Apply it
After an agreed pain intervention, a patient still cannot move comfortably for essential care. Reassess pain and relevant observations, check for adverse effects and seek review of the plan rather than recording the treatment as successful.
Common pitfall: A quiet appearance does not establish satisfactory pain relief. Compare with the person's own report and agreed goal, while assessing reduced responsiveness as a possible concern.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Read The Code online
36.How are eating and drinking needs turned into care?
Assessment should identify whether a person can obtain, prepare and consume adequate food and fluid safely, and what assistance they need. Explore preferences and relevant restrictions, record intake where indicated and evaluate whether support is effective. A tray placed nearby is not evidence that a dependent person has eaten. New difficulty swallowing or a significant change in intake requires appropriate assessment and escalation rather than repeated encouragement without investigating the barrier.
Apply it
A patient repeatedly leaves meals untouched because they cannot open packaging or reach the tray. Provide appropriate assistance, record actual intake and reassess whether these changes improve eating, while investigating any additional symptoms or concerns.
Common pitfall: Labelling the person as refusing food can conceal a practical access problem. Establish why intake is poor before assuming preference, motivation or independence explains it.
37.Which amoxicillin adverse effects require a different response from routine symptom monitoring?
Nausea, diarrhoea and rash are commonly reported with amoxicillin, but severity and associated findings change the response. New airway swelling, breathing difficulty or circulatory compromise suggests anaphylaxis, which can occur without skin or mucosal changes. Stop administration, activate emergency help and immediately give intramuscular adrenaline: for an adult, 500 micrograms using the 1 mg/mL preparation, repeated after five minutes if there is no improvement. Continue ABCDE care and reassessment alongside this first-line treatment. Significant diarrhoea during or after antibiotics requires assessment for antibiotic-associated colitis, which can be severe. The product information requires discontinuation and medical assessment if colitis occurs and contraindicates anti-peristaltic medicines in that situation. Document the suspected medicine and reaction details.
Apply it
An adult receiving amoxicillin develops frequent diarrhoea with abdominal pain. Assess stool pattern, hydration and physiological observations, obtain prompt medical review for possible antibiotic-associated colitis and follow infection precautions. Do not simply give an anti-peristaltic medicine. In a separate adult case, sudden wheeze and collapse during administration indicate suspected anaphylaxis even without a rash. Stop the medicine, activate emergency help and immediately administer 500 micrograms of intramuscular adrenaline using the 1 mg/mL preparation. Provide ABCDE care, reassess the response and repeat adrenaline after five minutes if there is no improvement.
Common pitfall: A listed common adverse effect is not automatically harmless. Do not describe isolated nausea as confirmed anaphylaxis, or dismiss severe diarrhoea because mild diarrhoea is common. Record the actual reaction and clinical assessment.
Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596 · The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK · Special circumstances Guidelines | Resuscitation Council UK · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
Leading and managing nursing care and working in teams10% of nursing Part B
38.Which factors determine whether a task can be delegated?
Delegation should match the person's needs, the task's demands and the proposed colleague's competence. Consider stability, complexity, foreseeable risk and the supervision available. Give clear instructions about the expected result and when to seek help. A colleague's job title or willingness is not enough to establish suitability for a particular task. If essential conditions are missing, change the allocation or obtain appropriate support rather than transferring risk through a verbal request.
Apply it
Before allocating mobility assistance, check the patient's current transfer needs and whether the colleague is competent with the required equipment. State the assistance plan and the changes that must be reported before another transfer.
Common pitfall: Delegating because someone is available overlooks capability and patient risk. Competence for a similar task does not automatically cover a more complex situation or unfamiliar equipment.
39.What responsibility remains after delegation?
The delegating nurse remains accountable for deciding to delegate, providing suitable instructions and supervision, and confirming the outcome. The colleague also remains accountable for their own actions and for working within competence. Delegation therefore creates a coordinated responsibility rather than removing the nurse's involvement. Agree what will be reported and when, and check that the activity met the required standard. Increase supervision or reassess allocation if the person's condition or task demands change.
Apply it
A competent colleague assists with agreed personal care and reports new skin damage. Review the finding, assess its significance and update care. Do not assume that delegation means the colleague alone must manage every resulting decision.
Common pitfall: Asking whether the task is finished is insufficient when the outcome or new findings need review. Confirm the standard and relevant results, not just completion.
40.How should a team respond when workload exceeds safe capacity?
Make the mismatch between patient needs and available capability explicit. Identify urgent risks, reprioritise care, redistribute tasks within competence and escalate for additional support. Communicate what remains unmet and continue reassessing as conditions change. Quietly attempting everything can conceal the problem and delay help. The leadership decision is how to protect essential care while making resource limitations visible, with a clear account of the risk and the assistance required.
Apply it
Two patients require simultaneous urgent review while essential care for others is delayed. Call for support, allocate competent staff to immediate needs and inform the responsible manager of specific remaining risks and the resources required.
Common pitfall: A general statement that the ward is busy gives little basis for action. Describe affected patients, urgency, current mitigations and what additional support is needed.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates
41.How can feedback improve practice without becoming personal criticism?
Constructive feedback describes an observed behaviour, explains its effect and agrees a specific improvement. Use an appropriate setting and invite the colleague's perspective, while addressing immediate safety issues without delay. Distinguish a knowledge gap, unclear instruction or system obstacle from an assumption about attitude. A useful outcome is an observable change and a plan to review it. Respectful feedback supports learning but does not excuse leaving unsafe practice unchallenged.
Apply it
A colleague's handover omits outstanding actions. Speak privately using a specific example, explain the continuity risk and agree a structure that identifies each action, its owner and urgency. Review a later handover together.
Common pitfall: Calling someone careless gives no clear route to improvement. Equally, softening feedback until the required change is unclear prevents meaningful evaluation and may leave risks unresolved.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Read The Code online
42.When does a colleague's practice require immediate challenge?
An observed action that creates an immediate safety risk requires prompt intervention within your role and escalation when needed. Protect the person first, describe the concern factually and obtain competent assistance. A later teaching conversation may be useful, but it cannot replace interruption of imminent harm. Concerns about continuing competence should follow appropriate reporting and support processes. Hierarchy, friendship or the colleague's experience does not remove the duty to act on a credible risk.
Apply it
You see a colleague preparing to use equipment they say they have never operated. Pause the unsafe step, arrange competent help and inform the appropriate supervisor. Address learning needs after the immediate patient risk is controlled.
Common pitfall: Waiting until a private feedback meeting may allow preventable harm. Use respectful language, but do not let concern about embarrassment override a necessary immediate safety intervention.
Read The Code online · Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates
Improving safety and quality of care10% of nursing Part B
43.Why should a near miss be reported?
A near miss reveals a route by which harm could occur even though the final outcome was avoided. First make the immediate situation safe, then report the event through the appropriate system with accurate facts. Include how the problem was detected and what prevented harm. Reporting supports examination of underlying conditions and barriers. The absence of injury is useful outcome information, not evidence that the process was safe or that learning is unnecessary.
Apply it
An incorrect patient label is detected before a specimen leaves the ward. Correct the immediate problem through the approved process and report the near miss, including how it arose and which check identified it.
Common pitfall: Quietly correcting the error may protect this patient while leaving the same failure route in place. Do not reserve reporting only for incidents that produce injury.
Read The Code online · Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates
44.How should an unresolved safety concern be escalated?
Raise concerns promptly with the appropriate person and describe the risk, relevant evidence and action required. If the response does not resolve the concern, continue through the appropriate escalation route rather than assuming that one report ends responsibility. Document what was raised, to whom and the response, while maintaining confidentiality. Urgent danger needs urgent action. The important distinction is between sending a message and confirming that a credible risk has received an adequate response.
Apply it
Repeated requests have not secured help for a worsening staffing-related risk. Restate the specific unmet needs and current safeguards, escalate to the next responsible level and keep a factual record of contacts and responses.
Common pitfall: A manager's acknowledgement is not necessarily resolution. Continue to assess the actual risk and use further appropriate escalation when the response leaves people inadequately protected.
Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates · Read The Code online
45.How do audit denominators change interpretation?
An audit percentage compares a defined numerator with the eligible denominator, so raw event counts can mislead when sample sizes differ. State what qualified for inclusion and apply the same definition across comparison periods. A higher number of compliant cases can coexist with a lower compliance rate. Audit findings identify performance against a standard, but small or changing samples require cautious interpretation. Compare like with like before deciding whether care has improved.
Apply it
A fictional audit finds complete records in 18 of 20 cases, then 24 of 30 cases. Although six more records are complete, compliance falls from 90% to 80%, prompting examination of comparable sampling and remaining omissions.
Common pitfall: Celebrating a larger numerator ignores the number of opportunities for compliance. A percentage also becomes misleading if the eligibility rules change between the compared samples.
46.How can an improvement be tested rather than assumed?
Define the problem, the intended improvement and a measure before changing the process. Establish a baseline, introduce a proportionate change and compare subsequent performance using consistent criteria. Ask whether the change achieved the intended benefit and created any new difficulties. A favourable impression alone cannot establish effectiveness. Use findings to retain, adapt or discontinue the change, and involve those delivering and receiving care so that the solution addresses the real problem.
Apply it
A team adds an outstanding-actions field to handover. Define what counts as a complete action entry, sample handovers before and after introduction and ask staff whether the field improves follow-through without obscuring urgent information.
Common pitfall: Introducing a form is an implementation event, not proof of improved safety. Measure the intended result and check whether new workarounds or omissions have appeared.
47.How do medicine interactions change monitoring when amoxicillin is started?
A new medicine can alter the safety of an established regimen. Amoxicillin product information reports increased INR in some patients taking warfarin or acenocoumarol and recommends careful INR or prothrombin-time monitoring when amoxicillin is added or withdrawn. Penicillins may also reduce methotrexate excretion, increasing toxicity risk. Identify interacting medicines, arrange a specific monitoring plan and communicate it across care transitions. Do not infer that previous stability protects against a new interaction.
Apply it
An adult taking warfarin starts amoxicillin. Check that the responsible prescriber or anticoagulation service has arranged INR monitoring, assess and report bleeding symptoms, and include the antibiotic start and expected stop dates in handover. Ensure someone owns follow-up after withdrawal as well as during treatment.
Common pitfall: Do not independently omit warfarin or alter its dose simply because an interaction is possible. Monitoring and any dose adjustment require an authorised plan; a generic instruction to watch for side effects is insufficient.
Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596 · Medicines optimisation — NICE NG5 recommendations · Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
Coordinating care10% of nursing Part B
48.When is medicines reconciliation required, and what information must it establish?
Medicines reconciliation establishes an accurate list, compares it with current orders, resolves discrepancies and communicates the result. In an acute setting, NICE recommends completion within 24 hours of admission, or sooner when clinically necessary. Include prescribed, over-the-counter and complementary medicines; name, strength, formulation, dose, route and timing; allergies and reaction details; reasons for changes; relevant last-dose times; and monitoring needs. In primary care after discharge, reconcile before a new prescription or supply and within one week of the practice receiving the information.
Apply it
An admission record omits a patient's non-prescription medicine and records only 'antibiotic allergy'. Establish the actual product and reaction, verify the medicine history and clinically important last doses, and resolve differences with a competent practitioner. A dose due soon may require clarification before the 24-hour limit.
Common pitfall: The acute 24-hour recommendation does not replace the separate primary-care timing. Copying a list without checking allergy reactions, changes or time-critical doses leaves important transition risks unresolved.
49.How should an unexplained medication discrepancy be handled?
A discrepancy is a difference requiring clarification, not automatic proof that either source is wrong. Determine whether the change was intended, assess any immediate risk and contact the appropriate practitioner to resolve it. Record the decision and communicate the corrected information to those who need it. Nurses should not independently recreate an old prescription merely because it appears on a previous list. The key is verified intent with a clear and safe current plan.
Apply it
A medicine appears on the patient's home list but not on discharge documentation, and no reason is recorded. Contact the responsible team to establish whether stopping was intended before giving the patient conflicting continuation advice.
Common pitfall: Assuming every omission is deliberate can miss an error; assuming every omission is accidental can reverse an intended treatment change. Resolve intent rather than choosing a list.
Medicines optimisation — NICE NG5 recommendations · Read The Code online
50.Which information makes a transfer handover actionable?
A transfer handover should enable the receiving team to continue care safely. Include current condition, relevant risks, care needs, medicines information and outstanding investigations or actions. Make urgency, responsibility and escalation arrangements explicit. Information must reflect the person's present state rather than a copied earlier assessment. A useful test is whether the recipient can identify what must happen next and who is responsible. Sending a document alone does not establish that urgent information was understood.
Apply it
A patient transfers with a pending review of worsening mobility. Explain the current assistance level, relevant changes and outstanding review, identify who will follow it up and confirm that the receiving nurse understands the immediate care requirements.
Common pitfall: A long history can obscure the next required action. Prioritise current risks and outstanding work while ensuring the written record remains accurate and available.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Medicines optimisation — NICE NG5 recommendations
51.How does discharge planning establish continuity?
Discharge planning connects assessed needs with practical arrangements after leaving the service. Establish what the person can manage, what support is agreed and whether required referrals, information and supplies are in place. Discuss medicines changes, follow-up and whom to contact for relevant concerns. Check understanding rather than relying on a departure leaflet. A completed referral does not guarantee a service has accepted responsibility, so unresolved arrangements need explicit follow-up before the plan is treated as complete.
Apply it
A patient needs help with daily care after discharge. Confirm the agreed service arrangements and start date, explain the plan in an accessible way and resolve any gap between leaving hospital and the first support visit.
Common pitfall: An expected discharge date is not evidence that support is ready. Avoid assuming that a relative will provide care without discussing ability, willingness and the person's preferences.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Read The Code online
52.Why must interprofessional actions have an identified owner?
Shared care creates a risk that each professional assumes someone else will complete an outstanding task. Identify the action, the responsible practitioner or team, its urgency and how completion or escalation will be communicated. Respect professional roles while ensuring the person's needs do not fall between services. The important distinction is agreement about responsibility rather than merely mentioning a problem. Revisit ownership when staff, locations or clinical circumstances change.
Apply it
A multidisciplinary discussion identifies a need for mobility equipment before discharge. Record which service will assess and arrange it, the required timing and who will check completion before the patient leaves the ward.
Common pitfall: Writing 'team aware' does not identify who will act. A shared discussion needs explicit responsibility and follow-up when an unresolved task affects safety or continuity.
Standards of proficiency for registered nurses · Read The Code online
Annexe A: Communication and relationship management skills7% of nursing Part B
53.How does teach back reveal misunderstanding?
Teach back asks the person to explain important information or the agreed plan in their own words. Frame it as a check on how clearly you explained, not as an examination of the patient. Their account reveals specific gaps that a simple question about understanding may miss. Clarify the misunderstood point and check again. The goal is an accurate usable explanation, rather than repetition of professional language or reassurance that the person has no questions.
Apply it
After discussing a follow-up plan, ask the patient to describe what they will do when they get home and whom they will contact with concerns. Correct any misunderstanding, then invite them to explain the revised plan.
Common pitfall: Asking 'Do you understand?' often produces a polite yes without demonstrating comprehension. Avoid turning teach back into a memory test or blaming the person for unclear explanations.
54.When is chunk and check especially useful?
Chunk and check presents a small amount of information, pauses to assess understanding and then builds the next part. It reduces the burden of processing a long uninterrupted explanation and allows early correction of misunderstanding. Choose a logical sequence based on what the person needs to decide or do. The checking step matters as much as shortening the message. Adapt the pace and format when distress, fatigue or communication needs make processing more difficult.
Apply it
A tired patient needs several discharge instructions. Explain one priority topic, check their understanding and answer questions before moving to the next. Provide an accessible written summary that follows the same sequence for later reference.
Common pitfall: Dividing a lecture into shorter sentences without checking understanding preserves the same problem. Each pause should inform whether to clarify, slow down or proceed.
55.How should language barriers be addressed during important discussions?
Important discussions require communication support that enables accurate, private and meaningful participation. Establish the person's language needs and arrange appropriate interpreting support rather than assuming conversational fluency covers complex clinical information. Speak to the person, use manageable explanations and check understanding through the supported conversation. Consider privacy and possible influence when others offer to interpret. The goal is the person's own informed participation, not merely completing the discussion quickly.
Apply it
A patient can exchange greetings in English but cannot explain the proposed care. Arrange appropriate interpreting support, address the patient directly and check their understanding before relying on agreement to an important treatment decision.
Common pitfall: A relative's convenient availability does not establish accuracy or freedom from influence. Do not assume that speaking basic English means the person understands complex clinical choices.
Read The Code online · Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
56.How can listening clarify distress before advice is given?
Active listening uses open questions, attentive pauses and reflection to understand the person's concern before proposing a solution. Distress may arise from symptoms, uncertainty, loss of control or a practical problem, and those causes need different responses. Acknowledge the experience without promising outcomes you cannot guarantee. Summarise what you heard and check that it is accurate. Clear understanding makes subsequent information or action more relevant and supports a respectful therapeutic relationship.
Apply it
A patient repeatedly asks to leave and appears upset. Ask what is worrying them, listen without interruption and reflect their main concern. Discovering that a dependent relative is alone may reveal a practical issue requiring coordinated support.
Common pitfall: Immediate reassurance can unintentionally dismiss the concern and conceal its cause. Avoid assuming that repeated questions are simply difficult behaviour or that more information is always the answer.
Read The Code online · Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
Annexe B: Nursing procedures7% of nursing Part B
57.When is hand hygiene needed around glove use?
In an NHS setting in England, standard infection control precautions require hand hygiene at relevant care moments, including before putting on and after removing gloves. Gloves can become contaminated, and removing them can contaminate hands. Their presence therefore does not replace hand hygiene. Plan the sequence of care so that clean equipment and contact are not contaminated by an earlier task. The deciding factor is the care activity and contamination risk, not whether gloves look clean.
Apply it
After removing gloves used for a contaminated task, a nurse needs to handle clean equipment for the next procedure. Perform hand hygiene before moving to that clean activity and select new protective equipment if indicated.
Common pitfall: Assuming gloves keep hands clean throughout care overlooks contamination during use and removal. A fresh pair alone does not replace the required hand hygiene step.
National infection prevention and control manual for England: Chapter 1
58.Which changes in activity require glove review?
Gloves are selected according to the task and exposure risk, and they must be changed when moving between patients or between contaminated and clean activities where indicated. Keeping the same gloves on can transfer contamination to equipment, surfaces or another body site. Remove them when their purpose ends and perform hand hygiene. In the England infection-control framework, glove use is part of standard precautions based on assessed risk, not a reason to wear gloves continuously.
Apply it
In an NHS ward in England, a nurse finishes a contaminated care activity and then prepares to assist the same patient with a clean task. Remove the used gloves, perform hand hygiene and reassess protection for the next activity.
Common pitfall: Using one pair for all care of one patient can still spread contamination. The change from dirty to clean activity matters even when patient identity is unchanged.
National infection prevention and control manual for England: Chapter 1
59.How do key parts and key sites determine aseptic protection?
Key parts are equipment components that could contaminate the patient if contaminated, such as a syringe tip, catheter tip or sterile connection. Key sites are portals of entry, such as an insertion site or open wound. Protect them with non-touch technique and suitable aseptic fields. In the Frimley Health framework, simple procedures may use a general field with individually protected key parts; complex procedures may require a critical sterile field. Sterile gloves are required when direct contact with key parts or sites is necessary.
Apply it
During intravenous preparation, keep the syringe tip protected and avoid touching the disinfected access connection. If the syringe tip touches an unclean surface, stop and replace it with a sterile component. Re-establish any affected field or site preparation before continuing.
Common pitfall: Non-sterile gloves do not make touching a key part safe, and sterile gloves can themselves become contaminated. Select gloves for the procedure and exposure risk, maintain hand hygiene and follow the applicable local aseptic procedure.
Principles of Asepsis | Frimley Health Guidelines · National infection prevention and control manual for England: Chapter 1
60.When should a procedure pause for reassessment?
Before a procedure, verify the person, the intended intervention, relevant authorisation, equipment and your competence, and explain what will happen. Continue to observe the person's response rather than treating preparation as the final safety check. New distress, withdrawal of consent, unexpected findings or equipment concerns may require stopping and seeking appropriate review. The decision depends on whether it remains safe and agreed to continue, with immediate threats addressed promptly within competence.
Apply it
During a planned non-emergency procedure, a patient asks you to stop because of unexpected pain. Pause, assess their condition and wishes, explain the next steps and obtain appropriate review before considering whether the procedure should resume.
Common pitfall: Initial agreement does not authorise continuing regardless of new symptoms or withdrawn consent. Completing the task is secondary to reassessing whether continuation remains safe and acceptable.
Read The Code online · Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
What to focus on during revision
The following are CertMedbry study suggestions. Use the official outline to check the full scope of your examination.
- Give extra clinical study time to accountability, assessment and care delivery while retaining all seven platforms and both annexes.
- Practise numerical entry as well as these multiple-choice calculations; label units, estimate scale and check the result independently.
- Connect respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, perfusion, consciousness and urine output with physiological threats and reassessment after treatment.
- Distinguish responsive deterioration requiring ABCDE from unresponsiveness with abnormal breathing requiring the cardiac arrest response.
- For medicines, explain the intended effect, assess renal function and interactions, distinguish common symptoms from serious adverse reactions, and identify monitoring responsibilities.
- Apply the England and Wales capacity criteria to a particular supported decision; distinguish an unwise choice from inability caused by an impairment of mind or brain.
- Use concrete pressure-prevention intervals, skin-assessment cues and cause-directed delirium care rather than relying on equipment or recognition alone.
- For delegation, reporting and handover, identify the responsible person, the expected action, its urgency and how completion will be confirmed.
- Use the adult nursing blueprint to extend beyond this selective guide, including field-specific knowledge and the complete proficiency mappings.
A practical preparation plan
1. Map the adult nursing scope
Read the nursing specification and RNA adult nursing blueprint. Mark each platform and annexe, then identify adult nursing topics outside these 60 concepts that still need study.
2. Build a numeracy working method
Practise conversions, tablets, liquids, injections, infusion rates and fluid balance. Write units at each step, check scale and practise entering a numerical result without relying on options.
3. Explain clinical decisions aloud
For each case, explain the physiological mechanism, decisive findings, immediate nursing action and observations needed to judge the response. For medicine cases, add adverse effects, interactions and relevant renal or laboratory monitoring.
4. Complete and analyse the question set
Answer all 20 drills before reviewing explanations. For every error, identify whether the problem was missing knowledge, overlooking a cue, arithmetic or choosing an action outside the stated role.
5. Revisit weak decisions using recall
Use the flashcards without viewing their backs. Create a new adult scenario for difficult concepts and explain how a changed finding would alter the decision.
6. Practise the official format and confirm arrangements
Use the Pearson practice tests linked by the NMC to become familiar with the actual interface and answer styles. Check current NMC instructions for your pathway, booking and any required reasonable adjustments.
Use your sample score as a starting point
The free set contains 20 original practice questions. It is a small learning sample, not an official examination or a validated pass prediction. Review each explanation and its source before moving to another topic.
Start the free sampleOfficial sources and updates
- NMC CBT: Test of Competence 2021
- Test of Competence 2021: Preparation materials
- Test of Competence: Part 1 Nursing — Candidate information booklet — The Computer-Based Test
- Test of Competence 2021: Nursing Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
- Test of Competence 2021: Adult nursing blueprint, V1.0
- Test of Competence 2021: Midwifery Test Specification for Candidates, V1.1
- Test of Competence 2021: Midwifery blueprint, V1.0
- Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
- Standards of proficiency for registered nurses
- Read The Code online
- Openness and honesty when things go wrong: The professional duty of candour
- Raising concerns: Guidance for nurses, midwives and nursing associates
- The ABCDE Approach — Resuscitation Council UK
- Quit smoking — Better Health — NHS
- Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64 — NHS
- Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management — NICE CG103 recommendations
- Pressure ulcers: prevention and management — NICE CG179 recommendations
- Medicines optimisation — NICE NG5 recommendations
- Shared decision making — NICE NG197 recommendations
- National infection prevention and control manual for England: Chapter 1
- Adult basic life support Guidelines — Resuscitation Council UK, 2025
- Make decisions on behalf of someone: Checking mental capacity - GOV.UK
- Mental Capacity Act 2005
- http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2005/9
- Principles of Asepsis | Frimley Health Guidelines
- Amoxicillin 1g, powder for solution for injection/ infusion - Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) - (emc) | 102596
- Special circumstances Guidelines | Resuscitation Council UK
- http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2005/9
- http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2005/9
- http://www.legislation.gov.uk/id/ukpga/2005/9
Confirm current eligibility, fees, scheduling and policies directly with the examination provider. CertMedbry is independent and is not endorsed by these organisations. How we handle content and corrections.